![]() ![]() A lot of additional people have allegedly died from COVID-19 since then. To be clear, the data she is using is just from April. ![]() What professor Briand also found peculiar is that the percentage of deaths among those in the 65+ bracket appear to be relatively similar to those in younger brackets and has remained pretty constant even after the epidemic began. But a decreased number of heart attacks and all the other death causes doesn't give us a choice but to point to some misclassification," Briand replied. If was not misleading at all, what we should have observed is an increased number of heart attacks and increased COVID-19 numbers. This is likely the main explanation as to why COVID-19 deaths drastically increased while deaths by all other diseases experienced a significant decrease … Even patients dying from other underlying diseases but are infected with COVID-19 count as COVID-19 deaths. "The CDC classified all deaths that are related to COVID-19 simply as COVID-19 deaths. So how are the deaths being recategorized? "Briand believes that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may instead be recategorized as being due to COVID-19." More shocking still is that her analysis shows a commensurate drop in deaths among other typical leading causes of fatality this year. The article originally posted by Gu seeks to answer the following question: Are there really anywhere near 260,000 excess deaths this year of people who died early due to COVID-19? Gu, the student who wrote the article, notes that based on Briand's use of CDC's excess death data, there have actually been relatively few excess deaths this year. How many people really died earlier in 2020? Isn't it interesting how any analysis that seems to cast doubt on the prevailing panicked narrative of the virus must immediately be deleted or censored? When was the last time you saw one of the numerous inaccurate papers overstating the threat of the virus taken down from the web or labeled as inaccurate on social media? In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States." "These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people's assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. I originally saw the article on Thanksgiving morning and quickly saw this very catchy conclusion. Genevieve Briand, an economics teacher at Hopkins. deaths due to COVID-19." It was based on an analysis conducted by Dr. ![]() Last week, the Johns Hopkins News-Letter, a student newspaper, posted an article by Yanni Gu titled, "A closer look at U.S. Their views cannot coexist with any trace of dissent on the internet, which is why Johns Hopkins University, which has become a lead advocate for lockdowns, is evidently now censoring its own faculty in academic research. If data analysis is insensitive or appears to "trivialize" a pandemic, does it make the research false? The arguments of the lockdown and mask totalitarians are so fickle that they must resort to unprecedented censorship in order to win the day. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |